Controversy is brewing in Kimberley as opposition council members raise concerns over the decision-making process that led to the approval of the return of the Diamonds & Dorings festival. The controversy revolves around a special council meeting on Monday, February 5, where Premier Zamani Saul’s request for the festival’s comeback was expedited, bypassing established municipal rules of order.
Members of the opposition council allege that the decision to greenlight the event lacked transparency and adherence to procedural norms. According to the opposition council, the matter did not undergo scrutiny in any municipal committee before being presented to the council, a departure from the required practice that has sparked concerns about potential violations of laws governing municipal finance.
Further claims that crucial information regarding the legal and financial implications of hosting Diamonds & Dorings was only disclosed to councillors after the meeting’s conclusion. This lack of transparency, they argue, raises questions about the thoroughness of the decision-making process and the council’s commitment to responsible governance.
Opposition council members are particularly critical of the use of the municipality’s Langley resort to host the festival. Doubts have been raised regarding the proper consideration of the municipal budget and the potential loss of revenue for the municipality, concerns that opposition members argue were not adequately addressed during the special council meeting.
The controversy also brings attention to Diamonds & Dorings’ association with Macronymn, a company previously named and shamed by the Public Protector for its involvement in questionable Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) deals during the pandemic. The opposition council members argue that insufficient scrutiny of such associations raises concerns about the responsible use of public resources and the potential implications for the municipality.
As opposition council members voice their concerns, the controversy surrounding the decision casts a shadow on the responsible allocation of public funds. The need for transparent decision-making processes, especially in matters involving public resources, is highlighted, as the opposition council members advocate for scrutiny to ensure the municipality’s financial integrity and the well-being of its residents.
This article was written by Jurno.
Tags: Sol Plaatje Municipality